News from 23 April 2026
Find help with safety checks and inspections.
A Housing Ombudsman case involved a family moving into a social rented home with unresolved damp and leaks, despite more than £5,000 of work before the tenancy. The report examined missed survey recommendations and delays to repairs.
What the Ombudsman found
The Ombudsman said the landlord had records showing a known leak, water damage and a recommendation for a damp survey before the family moved in. The report says a damp survey had been carried out, but its recommendations were not properly acted on or recorded. Later investigations found the underlying cause was linked to pipework under the hallway floor, after repeated leaks and damp problems had already affected the household.
The wider-order report also criticised complaint handling and record management. It said the resident’s dissatisfaction was not converted into a complaint quickly enough, repairs were not prioritised effectively once the issue escalated, and there was too much uncertainty in the landlord’s own records about what had been inspected, recommended and completed. A series of missed opportunities can allow damp and mould to continue. More often, the damage builds through weak follow-up, scattered records and a tendency to treat repeat reports as isolated jobs instead of one connected problem.
What changed after the case
According to the Ombudsman, the landlord has now committed to a more structured void process. Supervisors will review and sign off void repairs before a property is let. Staff will review relevant property documents during the void stage to spot historic issues. Survey recommendations must either be raised as repairs or formally recorded if they are not being treated as immediate priority work. The landlord also reported wider changes to repair escalation, complaint handling, record-keeping and temporary accommodation arrangements where extensive works are needed.
Those are not private-sector rules in themselves, and this is not legal advice. They describe changes made by the social landlord after this case. If a landlord cannot show what was known about a property before move-in, what checks were carried out, and why a potential damp or leak issue was considered resolved, it becomes much harder to defend decisions later.
